Risk Communication Plan Term Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1250 words

Risk Communication Plan - Term Paper Example Risk communication is needed to create public trust in risk management and promote awareness of the specific risk issues (Sellnow 85). The specific objectives of communicating the issues related to the rainstorm risk may include educating and informing people about the risk, changing the audience behaviours and providing disaster warnings (Lundgren and McMakin 107). For example, one can use statistical comparisons to show the Glades County residents that there are still vulnerable to flash floods, storms and lightning. Behavioural change and guidance during emergencies would involve encouraging people to evacuate to open elevated places and avoid buildings during rain storms. A risk communication plan would be very important in risk management because the assessors can analyse the audience and plan for the most appropriate communication strategies suitable for these people. Additionally, a risk communication plan enables provision of accurate and detailed information about the risk and its potential outcomes. For example, rain storms are accompanied by lightning, storms and floods, which may lead to death and destruction of property. Pre-planning would help the risk managers to prepare in advance the aids of communication needed for the awareness campaigns or seminars. Consensus and crisis communication efforts would be appropriate in achieving the set objectives in the risk management initiative to be carried out in Glades County, Florida. In consensus communication, the involved communicators will need to agree with the audience through understanding their concerns and beliefs. In this way, they can agree on certain solutions, which are acceptable to the all the stakeholders (Lundgren and McMakin 109). For example, the communicators should identify the distinct beliefs and concerns of the people of Glades in categories of age, level of income, health status and ethnic groups. Old, poor or disabled people will most

Is Ham correct that the connection between science and naturalism is Movie Review

Is Ham correct that the connection between science and naturalism is 'arbitrary' - Movie Review Example Ham promotes the view that evolutionists are at fault because they outlaw what is supernatural and beyond explanation. They claim that anything which cannot be proven by science is unbelievable. This is how they deny the presence of supernaturalism in this world. There are many supernatural causes which cannot be explained by science, but that does not mean they are not real. Science rules out supernatural causes because it is a field which nurtures on the food of observations. However, anything not observable like historical science should be separated from the science that is observable. How can Billy Nye claim that the earth is 4.5 billion years old without being present through the course of billions of years to observe one species evolve from another? This suggests that speculation forms the bedrock of evolution which is quite ironical since Nye seems to champion the importance of observations and science. Ham’s belief that the connection between science and naturalism is arbitrary also seems to be supported by Ziman (1968) who argued that science should be distinguished from pseudoscience. Scientific method is based on observations and that makes science, but pseudoscience is only a collection of beliefs and speculations thought to be based on scientific method. Thagard (1978) also argues that science should be separated from pseudoscience. There is a wide popularity of pseudoscience presently which should be condemned. The relationship between science and naturalism is also man-made or arbitrary because confirmations for any theory or philosophy can be found anywhere. This means that the relationship between science and naturalism is not based on some concrete system, rather it is arbitrary. â€Å"It is easy to obtain confirmations, or verifications, for nearly every theory† (Popper 1957). Both Ham and Nye have worked for years to make the complex subject of origins understandable to the world. However, despite